New study finds bleak prospects for avoiding dangerous global warming
October 25th, 2011 by Jim JustBad news: a new study finds that the prospects for avoiding dangerous global warming are bleak, indeed.
In the study, titled Emission pathways consistent with a 2°C global temperature limit, the scientists reanalyzed a large set of previously published emission scenarios based on integrated assessment models. They found that in the set of scenarios with a ‘likely’ (greater than 66%) chance of staying below 2°C, emissions peak between 2010 and 2020 and fall to a median level of 44 Gt of CO2 equivalent in 2020 (compared with estimated median emissions across the scenario set of 48 Gt of CO2 equivalent in 2010).
Current climate models show if the increase in average global temperatures is to be kept below 2°C (3.6°F), emissions must not only peak by 2020, emissions must fall by almost 10% by 2020 – and then continue to fall rapidly to well under half of current emissions by 2050.
Climate scientist Neil Edwards commented on the study’s findings:
The alarming thing is very few scenarios give the kind of future we want.
The International Energy Agency (IEA) recently announced global CO2 emissions decreased for the first time since 1990, due to the 2008-2009 economic crisis – but warned, don’t expect a trend. A large rebound is anticipated in 2010. (Note: a report published by the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre and PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency found that global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions increased by more than 5% in 2010, reaching an all-time high.)
The IEA’s findings are contained in a free document which contains highlights from CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2011, an IEA statistics publication which will be released in November 2011. The document, which contains all the latest information on the level and growth of CO2 emissions, has been released to inform the upcoming UN climate negotiations in Durban. Key findings include:
- Two-thirds of global emissions for 2009 originated from just ten countries, with the shares of China and the United States far surpassing those of all others (combined, these two countries alone produced 41% of the world’s CO2 emissions).
- Between 1990 and 2009, CO2 emissions from the combustion of coal grew from 40% to 43% and natural gas from 18 to 20%, while CO2 emissions from oil fell from 42% to 37%.
- Two sectors – electricity and heat generation and transport – produced nearly two-thirds of global CO2 emissions in 2009, up from 58% in 1990.
In their study, the climate scientists found only three of the 193 scenarios examined would be very likely to keep the warming below the danger level – and all of those require heavy use of energy systems that actually remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere. That would require, for example, both creating biofuels and storing the carbon dioxide from their combustion in the ground. Edwards put it this way:
What we need is at the cutting edge. We need to be as innovative as we can be in every way.
In the statement quoted above, Edwards is assuming that the objective is to preserve the energy-intensive economic growth paradigm. But he paradigm is the problem. Every day it is becoming increasingly clear that cutting edge technology and innovation are not the answer.
One example: many Oregonians across the political spectrum, including Governor John Kitzhaber, have promoted forest biomass as a energy source, thinking woody debris from thinning, brush clearing and removing dead trees could could help the state meet its renewable energy goals while at the same time restoring forest health and providing jobs in rural communities. But not so fast, say OSU researchers: managing forests for biofuel production will increase carbon dioxide emissions from the forests by at least 14%. The OSU press release quotes co-author Beverly Law:
Until now there have been a lot of misconceptions about impacts of forest thinning, fire prevention and biofuels production as it relates to carbon emissions from forests. If our ultimate goal is to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, producing bioenergy from forests will be counterproductive. Some of these forest management practices may also have negative impacts on soils, biodiversity and habitat. These issues have not been thought out very fully.
Looking to technology and innovation to enable humans to continue to pursue the economic growth that is consuming the very ecosystems that sustain us is just the denial of an addict. What is necessary is that we acceptance: growth is destructive and must be reversed. We must welcome and embrace the collapse of our current economic system, and learn to live within an economic system that conserves rather than consumes the larger systems of which it is a part.



























Total Arctic sea ice volume from PIOMAS showing the volume of the mean annual cycle, the current year, and 2007 (the year of minimum sea ice extent in September). Shaded areas indicate one and two standard deviations from the mean.












