<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Goal One Coalition - One Town Square</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.goal1.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.goal1.org</link>
	<description>Discussions about energy, climate change, land use, and our communities</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 23:15:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. vehicle sales down in August, below 1983 levels</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/u-s-vehicle-sales-down-in-august-below-1983-levels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/u-s-vehicle-sales-down-in-august-below-1983-levels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Autodata Corp estimates light vehicle sales a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 11.47 million units in August, down 18.9% from August 2009 (which was boosted by cash-for-clunkers), and down 0.5% from the July 2010 sales rate. Calculated Risk posts this chart showing U.S. auto sales since the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) started keeping data [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Autodata Corp estimates <a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/09/us-light-vehicle-sales-115-million-saar.html">light vehicle sales </a><a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/09/us-light-vehicle-sales-115-million-saar.html"> a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 11.47 million units</a><a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/09/us-light-vehicle-sales-115-million-saar.html"> in  August</a>, down 18.9% from August 2009 (which was boosted by cash-for-clunkers), and  down 0.5% from the July 2010 sales rate.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/09/us-light-vehicle-sales-115-million-saar.html" target="_blank">Calculated Risk</a> posts this chart showing U.S. auto sales since the <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;ved=0CBkQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bea.gov%2F&amp;rct=j&amp;q=BEA&amp;ei=5OF-TIbuOIWasAOZ0uW1Cw&amp;usg=AFQjCNGlgk8_wGjXYidUvkmHgDWXS06b-g&amp;cad=rja" target="_blank">Bureau of Economic Analysis</a> (BEA) started keeping data in 1967.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_pMscxxELHEg/TH6wl8EUf1I/AAAAAAAAJOY/mNuAFUN1m9g/s320/VehicleSalesAug2010.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="205" /></p>
<p>The August 2009 “blip” was the product of “cash for clunkers.”</p>
<p>U.S. auto sales are still below levels last seen in 1983, when there were fewer registered drivers and a smaller population.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tvtw/10juntvt/10juntvt.pdf" target="_blank">VMT in the U.S. peaked in 2007</a>.  About <a href="http://casafoodshed.org/archives/2010/08/05/car-scrappage-exceeding-new-car-sales-number-of-vehicles-on-u-s-roads-decreasing/" target="_blank">14.8 million cars are being scrapped every year</a> in the U.S. With the number of cars on U.S. roads declining, it’s hard  to understand how projections that traffic volume on U.S. roads will  continue to increase in the future as it has in the past will prove out.  Maybe it’s time we start planning for reduced traffic volumes – which  might mean scuttling some of our most touted projects, such as the <a href="http://www.columbiarivercrossing.org/" target="_blank">Columbia River Crossing</a>.</p>
</div>
<p><ins datetime="2010-09-02T22:51:56+00:00"></ins></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/u-s-vehicle-sales-down-in-august-below-1983-levels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study shows rising CO2 levels mean bleak future for marine life</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/study-shows-rising-co2-levels-mean-bleak-future-for-marine-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/study-shows-rising-co2-levels-mean-bleak-future-for-marine-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study published in the September issue of the Journal of the Geological Society found that increasing CO2 levels are causing foram diversity to plummet: A unique ‘natural laboratory’ in the Mediterranean Sea is revealing the effects of rising carbon dioxide levels on life in the oceans. The results show a bleak future for marine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>A study published in the September issue of the Journal of the  Geological Society found that <a href="http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/gsl/views/page8336.html" target="_blank">increasing CO2 levels are causing foram  diversity to plummet</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A unique ‘natural laboratory’ in the Mediterranean Sea is  revealing the effects of rising carbon dioxide levels on life in the  oceans. The results show a bleak future for marine life as ocean acidity  rises, and suggest that similar lowering of ocean pH levels may have  been responsible for massive extinctions in the past.</p></blockquote>
<p>Rising carbon dioxide levels acidify the ocean, which has a particularly  devastating effect on organisms that have calcium carbonate shells,  like Foraminifera. The study, published in the September issue of the Journal of the   Geological Society, found that increasing CO2 levels caused foram   diversity to fall from 24 species to only 4. The study found a tipping point  occurs at mean pH 7.8, the pH level predicted for the end of this  century.</p>
<p>Forams record past events in the geological record. The  Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), 55 million years ago, was a  period of  massive carbon release and rapid warming, accompanied by  extinctions in marine life.</p>
<p>This statement by study co-author Dr. Jason Hall-Spencer in the Geological Society’s press release is not optimistic:</p>
<blockquote><p>Our natural laboratory provides a glimpse into the future of our oceans.</p></blockquote>
<p>Joseph Romm at <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2010/08/31/geological-society-acid-ocean-marine-lif/" target="_blank">Climate Progress</a> has posted this chart showing trends in ocean CO2 concentrations and pH at one sampling station off Hawaii.</p>
<p><img src="http://cmore.soest.hawaii.edu/images/aloha_curve_dave267a.gif" alt="" width="587" height="484" /></p>
<p>Romm also points out that the disappearance of forams has grave implications for the rest of the food chain.</p>
<blockquote><p>For an analysis of what that could mean, see <a title="Permanent Link: So much for geoengineering, 2:  Ocean dead zones to expand, “remain for thousands of years”" rel="bookmark" href="http://climateprogress.org/2009/09/26/2009/06/09/2009/02/17/so-much-for-geoengineering-2-ocean-dead-zones-to-expand-remain-for-thousands-of-years/"><em>2009 Nature Geoscience</em> study concludes <strong>ocean dead zones “devoid of fish and seafood” are poised to expand and “remain for thousands of years.”</strong></a></p></blockquote>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/study-shows-rising-co2-levels-mean-bleak-future-for-marine-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiny sea creatures suggest West Antarctic ice cap could melt</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/tiny-sea-creatures-suggest-west-antarctic-ice-cap-could-melt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/tiny-sea-creatures-suggest-west-antarctic-ice-cap-could-melt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic ice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study published in the journal Global Change Biology reports the discovery of very similar colonies of bryozoans – animals that anchor themselves to the seabed – in both the Ross and Weddell Seas. The bryozoans, sometimes called moss animals, are often microscopic as individuals but form colonies that can look like corals or some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>A study published in the journal <em><a href="http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=1354-1013" target="_blank"> Global Change Biology</a> </em>reports  the discovery of very similar colonies of bryozoans – animals that  anchor themselves to the seabed – in both the Ross and Weddell Seas.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.jamescairdsociety.com/pix/image003.gif" alt="" width="410" height="334" /></p>
<p>The bryozoans, sometimes called moss animals, are often microscopic  as  individuals but form colonies that can look like corals or some   seaweeds. Those found were unlike others around the current coast of   Antarctica.</p>
<p>So,what’s the big deal?</p>
<p>Bryozoans are largely static and their larvae, dispersed by currents,  are short-lived and quickly sink. How is it possible that two virtually  identical populations came to exist 2400 kilometers apart, separated by  the 2 kilometre thick West Antarctic ice sheet?</p>
<p>An article at <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2010/09/01/2999453.htm" target="_blank">ABC News in Science</a> quotes lead author David Barnes:</p>
<blockquote><p>The most likely explanation of such similarity is that  this ice sheet  is much less stable than previously thought and has  collapsed at some  point in the recent past. And if the West Antarctic  ice shelf has been lost in recent times we  have to re-think the  possibility of loss in future with climate  change.</p></blockquote>
<p>If the ice were gone a passage would become open through which currents could carry the larvae between the two seas.</p>
<p>Melting of the West Antarctica ice cap would raise world sea levels  by between 3.5 and 5 meters. In a brief warm period about 125,000 years  ago, world sea levels were about five meters higher than today and  temperatures probably at least 4°C warmer.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/tiny-sea-creatures-suggest-west-antarctic-ice-cap-could-melt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Leaked German military study warns of coming peak oil crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/leaked-german-military-study-warns-of-coming-peak-oil-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/leaked-german-military-study-warns-of-coming-peak-oil-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spiegel Online International reports A confidential German army study, warning of a looming oil crisis which could have dramatic political and economic consequences, has been leaked. The study – a product of the Future Analysis department of the Bundeswehr Transformation Center, a think tank tasked with fixing a direction for the German military – depicts [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><a href="http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,715138,00.html" target="_blank">Spiegel Online International reports</a> A confidential German army study, warning of a looming oil crisis which  could have dramatic political and economic consequences, has been  leaked. The study – a product of the Future Analysis department of the  Bundeswehr Transformation Center, a think tank tasked with fixing a  direction for the German military – depicts the consequences of an  irreversible depletion of raw materials.</p>
<p>According to Spiegel Online, the report concludes there is “some  probability that peak  oil will occur around the year 2010 and that the  impact on security is  expected to be felt 15 to 30 years later”. The study warns of:</p>
<blockquote><p>[S]hifts in the global balance of power, of the formation  of  new relationships based on interdependency, of a decline in  importance  of the western industrial nations, of the “total collapse of  the  markets” and of serious political and economic crises.</p></blockquote>
<p>The article provides the following summary of the report’s main points:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Oil will determine power</strong>: The Bundeswehr  Transformation Center writes that oil will become one decisive factor in  determining the new landscape of international relations: “The relative  importance of the oil producing nations in the international system is  growing. These nations are using the advantages resulting from this to  expand the scope of their domestic and foreign policies and establish  themselves as a new or resurgent regional, or in some cases even global  leading power.”</li>
<li><strong>Increasing importance of oil exporters</strong>: For  importers of oil more competition for resources will mean an increase in  the number of nations competing for favor with oil producing nations.  For the latter this opens up a window of opportunity which can be used  to implement political, economic or ideological aims. As this window of  time will only be open for a limited period, “this could result in a  more aggressive assertion of national interests on the part of the oil  producing nations.”</li>
<li><strong>Politics in place of the market</strong>: The Bundeswehr  Transformation Center expects that a supply crisis would roll back the  liberalization of the energy market. “The proportion of oil traded on  the global, freely accessible oil market will diminish as more oil is  traded through bi-national contracts,” the study states. In the long  run, the study goes on, the global oil market will only be able to  follow the laws of the free market in a restricted way. “Bilateral,  conditioned supply agreements and privileged partnerships, such as those  seen prior to the oil crises of the seventies, will once again come to  the fore.”</li>
<li><strong>Market failures</strong>: The authors paint a bleak picture  of the consequences resulting from a shortage of petroleum. As the  transportation of goods depends on crude oil, international trade could  be subject to colossal tax hikes. “Shortages in the supply of vital  goods could arise” as a result, for example in food supplies. Oil is  used directly or indirectly in the production of 95% of all industrial  goods. Price shocks could therefore be seen in almost any industry and  throughout all stages of the industrial supply chain. “In the medium  term the global economic system and every market-oriented national  economy would collapse.”</li>
<li><strong>Relapse into planned economy</strong>: Since virtually all  economic sectors rely heavily on oil, peak oil could lead to a “partial  or complete failure of markets,” says the study. “A conceivable  alternative would be government rationing and the allocation of  important goods or the setting of production schedules and other  short-term coercive measures to replace market-based mechanisms in times  of crisis.”</li>
<li><strong>Global chain reaction</strong>: “A restructuring of oil  supplies will not be equally possible in all regions before the onset of  peak oil,” says the study. “It is likely that a large number of states  will not be in a position to make the necessary investments in time,” or  with “sufficient magnitude.” If there were economic crashes in some  regions of the world, Germany could be affected. Germany would not  escape the crises of other countries, because it’s so tightly integrated  into the global economy.</li>
<li><strong>Crisis of political legitimacy</strong>: The Bundeswehr  study also raises fears for the survival of democracy itself. Parts of  the population could comprehend the upheaval triggered by peak oil “as a  general systemic crisis.” This would create “room for ideological and  extremist alternatives to existing forms of government.” Fragmentation  of the affected population is likely and could “in extreme cases lead to  open conflict.”</li>
</ul>
<p>The study, <em>Peak Oil: Sicherheitspolitische Implikationen knapper Ressourcen</em>, is available <a href="http://peak-oil.com/download/Peak%20Oil.%20Sicherheitspolitische%20Implikationen%20knapper%20Ressourcen%2011082010.pdf" target="_blank">here</a> (unfortunately in German). Robert Rapier has posted a translation of the major points in the report at his <a href="http://www.consumerenergyreport.com/2010/09/02/leaked-study-peak-oil-warns-severe-global-energy-crisis/" target="_blank">R Squared Energy Blog</a>.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/leaked-german-military-study-warns-of-coming-peak-oil-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arctic Ocean now circumnavigable</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/arctic-ocean-now-circumnavigable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/arctic-ocean-now-circumnavigable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic ice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dr. Jeff Masters at WunderBlog reports that both the Northwest Passage and the Northern Sea Route are now open. Data at the University of Illinois site Cryosphere Today shows it is now possible to completely circumnavigate the Arctic Ocean in ice-free waters – and this will probably continue to be the case for at least [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Dr. Jeff Masters at <a href="http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=1589" target="_blank">WunderBlog</a> reports that both the Northwest Passage and the Northern Sea Route are now open. Data at the University of Illinois site <a href="http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/" target="_blank">Cryosphere Today</a> shows it is now possible to completely circumnavigate the Arctic Ocean  in ice-free waters – and this will probably continue to be the case for  at least a month.</p>
<div style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/2010/northwestpassage.jpg" alt="" width="540" height="540" /></div>
<div>Arctic sea ice extent image for August 24, 2010, as compiled by The  University of Illinois Cryosphere Today.  The northern route (Western  Parry Channel) through the Northwest Passage was completely clear of  ice, as was the Northeast Passage. The southern route through the  Northwest Passage was still partially blocked.</div>
<div>
</div>
<p>This year marks the third  consecutive year–and the third time in recorded history–that both the <a href="http://www.wunderground.com/climate/NorthernPassages.asp" target="_blank">Northwest Passage and Northern Sea Route</a> have melted free, according to the <a onclick="if(!checkUrl(this.href)) return false;" rel="nofollow" href="http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/index.html" target="_blank">National Snow and Ice Data Center.</a></p>
<p>The Northeast Passage opened for  the first time in recorded history  in 2005, and the Northwest Passage in  2007. It now appears that the  opening of one or both of these northern  passages is the new norm.</p>
<p>Here’s an updated graphic:</p>
<p><img src="http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/NEWIMAGES/arctic.seaice.color.000.png" alt="" width="540" height="540" /></p>
<p>As this graphic from Chris Mooney’s article in <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20727751.300-arctic-ice-less-than-meets-the-eye.html?full=true" target="_blank"><em>New Scientist</em></a> shows, ice <em>volume</em> has been decreasing even more precipitously than ice area.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.newscientist.com/data/images/archive/2775/27751301.jpg" alt="" width="593" height="398" /></p>
<p>The average volume of Arctic ice between July and September has  fallen  from 21,000 cubic kilometres in 1979 to 8000 cubic kilometres in  2009, a 55% decline compared with the 1979 to 2000 average. This is  even faster than the decline in ice extent, which is 40% below the  long-term average.</p>
<p>Not only has the total volume of Arctic ice  continued to decline  since 2007 considerably more quickly than predicted by most climate  models, the rate of loss is  accelerating. The Arctic Ocean may soon  be essentially ice-free during the summer months. The dark ocean  waters, mostly devoid of ice, would then absorb still more sunlight,  further warming the overlying atmosphere during an increasingly lengthy  ice-free season, reshaping weather throughout the region and well beyond  it.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/09/01/arctic-ocean-now-circumnavigable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Arctic sea ice extent important?</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/26/why-is-arctic-sea-ice-extent-important/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/26/why-is-arctic-sea-ice-extent-important/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antarctic ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic ice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4435</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good friend recently asked me why I give so much attention to news about Arctic sea ice extent at this blog, saying he just glosses over posts on this subject. Here’s the reason: the area of sea ice cover is an important, amplifying climate feedback. Loss of sea ice is a cause of concern [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>A good friend recently asked me why I give so much attention to  news about Arctic sea ice extent at this blog, saying he just glosses  over posts on this subject.</p>
<p>Here’s the reason: the area of sea ice cover is an important,  amplifying climate feedback. Loss of sea ice is a cause of concern  because as the area of ice decreases, increased absorption of sunlight  by the darker ocean causes more sea ice melting. As this graph from <a href="http://www.columbia.edu/%7Emhs119/" target="_blank">Makiko Sato &amp; James Hansen’s new blog</a> shows, Arctic sea ice extent has been declining steadily . . .</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Arctic-sea-ice-area.jpg"><img class="aligncenter" title="Arctic sea ice area" src="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Arctic-sea-ice-area-1024x1024.jpg" alt="" width="491" height="491" /></a></p>
<p>. . . as has <a href="http://psc.apl.washington.edu/ArcticSeaiceVolume/IceVolume.php" target="_blank">sea ice <em>volume</em></a>. What ice remains is getting thinner.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://psc.apl.washington.edu/ArcticSeaiceVolume/images/BPIOMASIceVolumeAnomalyCurrent.png" alt="" width="496" height="357" /></p>
<p>It’s not just sea ice that is melting. Ice sheets are shrinking too, both in Greenland and in Antarctica.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.columbia.edu/%7Emhs119/IceSheet/Velicogna.gif" alt="" width="474" height="239" /></p>
<p>And the ice loss over the last few years has been at a time of  minimum solar irradiance. Solar irradiance is now once again on the  upswing.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.columbia.edu/%7Emhs119/UpdatedFigures/SolarIrad.gif" alt="" width="514" height="284" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">It seems likely that September Arctic sea ice may be all but gone  within a  few decades – or perhaps even sooner. What does less Arctic sea ice mean for  Earth’s weather patterns?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/future/images/heat-wiring-400.jpg" alt="" width="394" height="308" /></p>
<p>NASA is predicting <a href="http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/future/impacts.html" target="_blank">loss of summer sea ice will mean more severe winter storms</a> in the northern hemisphere – a prediction which is already being borne out.</p>
<p>Following Arctic sea ice extent is fascinating because it shows that  global warming is not something to worry about in the future. Global  warming is here and now, and is already affecting us in our daily lives.  What’s worrisome is that the impacts will only get more severe. By the  time the impacts are bad enough to get our attention, it will be too  late – the damage will already have been done. Under the best-case  scenario it will take Earth a thousand years or more to recover. Under  the worst-case scenario, Earth will flip into a different, stable  climate regime which won’t be hospitable to human existence.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/26/why-is-arctic-sea-ice-extent-important/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Northwest Passage, Northern Sea Route open again in 2010?</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/25/northwest-passage-northern-sea-route-open-again-in-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/25/northwest-passage-northern-sea-route-open-again-in-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), neither the Northwest Passage through the Canadian Arctic nor the Northern Sea Route along the coast of Siberia are yet free of ice and open – but it’s looking like they soon will be. A Russian gas tanker set out from Murmansk on August 14 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>According to the National Snow and Ice Data Center (<a href="http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/" target="_blank">NSIDC)</a>,  neither the Northwest Passage through the Canadian Arctic nor the  Northern Sea Route along the coast of Siberia are yet free of ice and  open – but it’s looking like they soon will be.</p>
<p>A Russian gas tanker set out from Murmansk on August 14 across the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Sea_Route" target="_blank">Northern Sea Route</a>,  escorted by two nuclear ice breakers, and is expected to deliver its  cargo of gas condensate to China by early September.</p>
<div>Northern Sea Route (blue) and alternative route through Suez Canal (red)</p>
</div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Northern_Sea_Route_vs_Southern_Sea_Route.svg/250px-Northern_Sea_Route_vs_Southern_Sea_Route.svg.png" alt="" width="250" height="250" /></p>
<p>Ice in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilkitsky_Strait" target="_blank">Vilkitsky Strait</a> is the only remaining impediment to shipping across the Northern Sea Route . . .</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/48/Vilkitsky_Strait.svg/325px-Vilkitsky_Strait.svg.png" alt="" width="325" height="294" /></p>
<p>. . . as seen in this NSIDC graphic of sea ice extent.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Ice-extent-8-24.jpg"><img class="aligncenter" title="Ice extent 8-24" src="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Ice-extent-8-24-870x1024.jpg" alt="" width="522" height="614" /></a></p>
<p>While this latest graphic shows the northern route of the Northwest Passage as being open, NSIDC’s <em>Arctic Sea Ice News</em> reports that as of August 17 neither the northern route (Western Parry  Channel) nor the southern  route (Amundsen’s Passage) through the  Northwest Passage were completely  clear of ice.  NSIDC says that sea  ice area within the northern route is currently well  below the 1968 to  2000 average and almost a month ahead of the clearing  that was observed  in 2007. In the southern route, there is still a substantial amount  of  ice.</p>
<div>Ice  concentration on August 16, 2010. Lines mark two well-known routes  through the Northwest Passage: Amundsen&#8217;s route is yellow, and the  northern route is red.</p>
</div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://nsidc.org/images/arcticseaicenews/20100817_Figure4.png" alt="" width="514" height="643" /></p>
<p>If winds push sea ice away from the  entrance to M’Clure Strait, the  northern route of the Northwest Passage  could open again this year – if it hasn’t already.</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 285px"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6a/Map_indicating_McClure_Strait%2C_Northwest_Territories%2C_Canada.png/275px-Map_indicating_McClure_Strait%2C_Northwest_Territories%2C_Canada.png" alt="" width="275" height="249" /><p class="wp-caption-text">M&#39;Clure Strait, Northwest Territories, Canada.</p></div>
<p>On August 21, 2007, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northwest_Passage" target="_blank">Northwest Passage became open to ships</a> without the need of an icebreaker.  The Northwest Passage opened again  on August 25, 2008. In late August 2008, satellite images showed that  the last ice blockage of the Northern Sea Route had melted – which would  be t<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northern_Sea_Route" target="_blank">he first time since satellite records  began that both the Northwest Passage and Northern Sea Route were  open simultaneously</a>.</p>
<p>The Northern Sea Route was open in 2005 but closed again by 2007. A  Russian nuclear icebreaker escorted a small convoy including two Western  commercial vessels westward through the Northern Sea Route in 2009.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/25/northwest-passage-northern-sea-route-open-again-in-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peak VMT: do we really need new roads &amp; bridges?</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/23/peak-vmt-do-we-really-need-new-roads-bridges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/23/peak-vmt-do-we-really-need-new-roads-bridges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Federal Highway Administration’s Traffic Volume Trends, June 2010 reports that vehicle miles driven in 2010 were up 1.3% over June 2010. Cumulative VMT for 2010 is now up 0.1% year to date over 2009: Travel on all roads and streets changed by +1.3% (3.4 billion vehicle miles) for June 2010 as compared with June [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>The Federal Highway Administration’s <a href="http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tvtw/10juntvt/10juntvt.pdf" target="_blank">Traffic Volume Trends, June 2010</a> reports that vehicle miles driven in 2010 were up 1.3% over June 2010.  Cumulative VMT for 2010 is now up 0.1% year to date over 2009:</p>
<blockquote><p>Travel on all roads and streets changed by +1.3% (3.4  billion vehicle miles) for June 2010 as compared with June 2009. Travel  for the month is estimated to be 263.9 billion vehicle miles.</p>
<p>Cumulative Travel for 2010 changed by +0.1% (1.6 billion vehicle  miles). The Cumulative estimate for the year is 1,469.8 billion vehicle  miles of travel.</p></blockquote>
<p>In Oregon, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in June declined 0.4% over 2009.</p>
<p>VMT in the U.S. now appear to be moving sideways. Miles driven are  still 1.8% below the peak, and only 0.1% above the 2009 trough.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/VMT-6-2010.jpg"><img class="aligncenter" title="VMT 6-2010" src="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/VMT-6-2010-791x1024.jpg" alt="" width="475" height="614" /></a></p>
<p>If the trend of ever-increasing VMT is now  broken or even reversing, that would call into question the wisdom and  the need of spending billions of dollars on capacity-enhancing  infrastructure projects. Take the <a href="http://www.columbiarivercrossing.org/" target="_blank">Columbia River Crossing</a>: if vehicle traffic is falling rather than increasing, why would we need it?</p>
<p>UPDATE 8/24: Todd Litman has posted on his <a href="http://www.planetizen.com/node/45665" target="_blank">blog</a> this chart showing how U.S. VMT is now down  about 10% from the long-term trend:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.vtpi.org/images/VMTtrends.jpg" alt="" width="590" height="323" /></p>
<p>Litman points out the emerging reality means we need to rethink our approach to transportation:</p>
<blockquote><p>This requires a major change in the way we think about  transportation problems and evaluate solutions. Most state and regional  transportation plans are based on the assumption that VMT will continue  to grow as it did in the past, so the primary problem is traffic  congestion. The decline in VMT growth indicates that traffic congestion  problems will be less severe and other problems will become more  important, including inadequate mobility options for non-drivers,  transit crowding, transport affordability, and environmental concerns.</p></blockquote>
<p>Litman concludes with what should be obvious to all: <strong>the need to expand roads and parking facilities will decline</strong>.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/23/peak-vmt-do-we-really-need-new-roads-bridges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global competition for liquid fuels heating up</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/18/global-competition-for-liquid-fuels-heating-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/18/global-competition-for-liquid-fuels-heating-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Peak Oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The August 2010 edition of Oilwatch Monthly has just been released. It leads off with a discussion of Chinese demand for oil, which has been running at 8.8 million barrels per day (mbd) for the first half of 2010. Chines consumption has been growing at a rate of 7% per year since 2003. This compares [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p style="text-align: left;">The August 2010 edition of <a href="http://www.theoildrum.com/files/2010_July_Oilwatch_Monthly.pdf" target="_blank">Oilwatch Monthly</a> has just been released. It leads off with a discussion of Chinese  demand for oil, which has been running at 8.8 million barrels per day  (mbd) for the first half of 2010. Chines consumption has been growing at  a rate of 7% per year since 2003. This compares to current U.S.  consumption of 19 mbd.  U.S. consumption had been stable at 20.7 mbd  prior to the economic crunch.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">While Chinese consumption is rising,  Chinese production is expected to peak in 2010 and then begin to decline  at a rate of about 3% per year. Chinese production rose to just over 4  mbd in July, hitting 4.09 mbd. But 70% of Chinese production comes from  nine giant fields, five of which are declining and another three of  which have peaked or are expected to peak in 2010.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">China, like the U.S., must import the  difference between production and consumption. Dropping production and  rising consumption can only mean one thing: greater demand for oil  imports. This, at a time when it&#8217;s already looking like supplies are beginning to get tight.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Global crude production has been going down since 2005.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Crude-production-8-10.jpg"><img title="Crude production 8-10" src="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Crude-production-8-10-791x1024.jpg" alt="Crude production 8-10" width="475" height="614" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">2008 – at least for the moment – saw the peak in all liquids production.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/NGL-8-10.jpg"><img title="NGL 8-10" src="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/NGL-8-10-791x1024.jpg" alt="NGL 8-10" width="475" height="614" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The main reason that all liquids production  has been maintained above 2005 levels is the increase in natural gas  liquids. Other nonconventional sources, such as biofuels, extra heavy  oil, and tar sands,  have played a rather minor role.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Nonconventional-oil-8-10.jpg"><img title="Nonconventional oil 8-10" src="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Nonconventional-oil-8-10-791x1024.jpg" alt="Nonconventional oil 8-10" width="475" height="614" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Aa the world struggles to maintain the <em>volume</em> of liquids fuels production, the struggle to maintain  the <em>energy content</em> of liquid fuels production is proving even more of a challenge.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Energy-content-8-10.jpg"><img title="Energy content 8-10" src="http://casafoodshed.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Energy-content-8-10-791x1024.jpg" alt="Energy content 8-10" width="475" height="614" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">In production statistics all liquid fuels  are aggregated as total “oil” production. However, different liquid  fuels contain different amounts of energy per barrel produced. For  example, a barrel of crude oil contains around 5.8 million British  Thermal Units (BTUs) while a similar barrel of natural gas liquids  contains 4.2 million BTUs. Conversion to BTUs shows that actual  available energy worldwide in January 2010 was 3.3% lower than liquids  statistics counted in barrels would suggest.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Oil consumption   in OPEC, China and India is growing at a good clip. Consumption in the U.S. and Europe has been  dropping. Were that not the case, there already would not be enough to go  around.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">The global competition for energy from liquid fuels is soon going to get fierce.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/18/global-competition-for-liquid-fuels-heating-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So far, 2010 hottest year on record</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/15/so-far-2010-hottest-year-on-record/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/15/so-far-2010-hottest-year-on-record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 23:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NOAA’s  State of the Climate Global Analysis for July reports that year-to-date, the global combined land and ocean surface temperature of 14.5°C (58.1°F) was the warmest January-July period on record, 0.68°C (1.22°F) above the 20th century average. This chart showing just how extraordinary this year has been so far is posted at NOAA’s website. January [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NOAA’s  <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/?report=global" target="_blank">State of the Climate Global Analysis</a> for July reports that year-to-date, the global combined land and ocean  surface temperature of 14.5°C (58.1°F) was the warmest January-July  period on record, 0.68°C (1.22°F) above the 20th century average.</p>
<p>This chart showing just how extraordinary this year has been so far is posted at NOAA’s website.</p>
<table id="year-to-date" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr style="text-align: center;">
<th>January – July</th>
<th>Anomaly</th>
<th>Rank<br />
(out of 131 years)</th>
<th>Warmest/Next Warmest<br />
Year on Record</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"><a title="year-to-date-global-anomalies" href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/get-file.php?report=global&amp;image=glob&amp;byear=2010&amp;bmonth=1&amp;year=2010&amp;month=7&amp;ext=gif">Global</a></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Land</th>
<td>+1.07°C (+1.93°F)</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1<sup>st</sup> warmest</td>
<td>2007 (+1.06°C/1.91°F)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Ocean</th>
<td>+0.54°C (+0.97°F)</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2<sup>nd</sup> warmest</td>
<td>1998 (+0.56°C/1.01°F)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Land and Ocean</th>
<td>+0.68°C (+1.22°F)</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1<sup>st</sup> warmest</td>
<td>1998 (+0.67°C/1.21°F)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"><a title="year-to-date-nhem-anomalies" href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/get-file.php?report=global&amp;image=lo-hem&amp;byear=2010&amp;bmonth=1&amp;year=2010&amp;month=7&amp;ext=gif">Northern Hemisphere</a></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Land</th>
<td>+1.16°C (+2.09°F)</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3<sup>rd</sup> warmest</td>
<td>2007 (+1.26°C/2.27°F)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Ocean</th>
<td>+0.54°C (+0.97°F)</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1<sup>st</sup> warmest</td>
<td>1998 (+0.53°C/0.95°F)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Land and Ocean</th>
<td>+0.78°C (+1.40°F)</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">1<sup>st</sup> warmest</td>
<td>2007 (+0.75°C/1.35°F)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th colspan="4"><a title="year-to-date-shem-anomalies" href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/get-file.php?report=global&amp;image=lo-hem&amp;byear=2010&amp;bmonth=1&amp;year=2010&amp;month=7&amp;ext=gif">Southern Hemisphere</a></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Land</th>
<td>+0.83°C (+1.49°F)</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">3<sup>rd</sup> warmest</td>
<td>2005 (+0.88°C/1.58°F)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Ocean</th>
<td>+0.55°C (+0.99°F)</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2<sup>nd</sup> warmest</td>
<td>1998 (+0.60°C/1.08°F)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th>Land and Ocean</th>
<td>+0.59°C (+1.06°F)</td>
<td style="text-align: center;">2<sup>nd</sup> warmest</td>
<td>1998 (+0.64°C/1.15°F)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/15/so-far-2010-hottest-year-on-record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Last remaining primeval forest in Europe under attack</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/12/last-remaining-primeval-forest-in-europe-under-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/12/last-remaining-primeval-forest-in-europe-under-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forestry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazingly, there’s one remaining, more or less intact stand of primeval forest left in Europe: the Bialowieza forest, which straddles the border between Poland and Belarus. Not surprisingly, that remnant 580-square-mile stand is under threat. Only 17% of the forest is protected as national park.  The rest is subject to selective logging, which proponents excuse [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Amazingly, <a href="http://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/12/rallying-behind-a-primeval-forest/" target="_blank">there’s one remaining, more or less intact stand of primeval forest left in Europe</a>: the Bialowieza forest, which straddles the border between Poland and Belarus.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2010/08/11/business/forest/forest-blogSpan.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="298" /></p>
<p>Not surprisingly, that remnant 580-square-mile stand is under threat.  Only 17% of the forest is protected as national park.  The rest is  subject to selective logging, which proponents excuse as “good for the  forest”.</p>
<p>The Bialowieza forest hosts a number of endangered species, including   the European woodland bison, which lives nowhere else in the wild. The   forest also provides habitat to wolves, boar, tarpan (a species  of  wild horse), badgers, moose, lynx, eagles and woodpeckers.</p>
<p>Greenpeace Poland is working to halt logging in the Bialowieza forest  until new forest management plans are drawn up which would limit  logging to the minimum required for local residents and ban it during  the bird nesting season. Wish them luck.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/12/last-remaining-primeval-forest-in-europe-under-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Climate change predicted to destroy 80% of world’s rainforests by 2100</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/09/climate-change-predicted-to-destroy-80-of-world%e2%80%99s-rainforests-by-2100/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/09/climate-change-predicted-to-destroy-80-of-world%e2%80%99s-rainforests-by-2100/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Land Use]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists predict in a new study that fewer than one in five of the plants and animals which currently live in the world’s rainforests will still be here in 90 years time. The culprits? Climate change and deforestation. The study, “Correlative and mechanistic models of species distribution provide congruent forecasts under climate change”, is published [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Scientists predict in a new study that <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/7928296/Climate-change-could-destroy-80-per-cent-of-rainforest-by-next-century.html" target="_blank">fewer  than one in five of the plants and animals which currently live in the  world’s rainforests will still be here in 90 years time</a>. The culprits? Climate change and deforestation.</p>
<p>The study, “Correlative and mechanistic models of species  distribution provide congruent forecasts under climate change”, is  published in the June edition of <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2010.00097.x/abstract" target="_blank">Conservation Letters</a>, an open-access journal. Here’s the abstract:</p>
<blockquote><p>Good forecasts of climate change impacts on extinction  risks are  critical for effective conservation management responses.  Species  distribution models (SDMs) are central to extinction risk  analyses. The  reliability of predictions of SDMs has been questioned  because models  often lack a mechanistic underpinning and rely on  assumptions that are  untenable under climate change. We show how  integrating predictions from  fundamentally different modeling  strategies produces robust forecasts  of climate change impacts on  habitat and population parameters. We  illustrate the principle by  applying mechanistic (Niche Mapper) and  correlative (Maxent, Bioclim)  SDMs to predict current and future  distributions and fertility of an  Australian gliding possum. The two  approaches make congruent, accurate  predictions of current distribution  and similar, dire predictions about  the impact of a warming scenario,  supporting previous correlative-only  predictions for similar species. We  argue that convergent lines of  independent evidence provide a robust  basis for predicting and managing  extinctions risks under climate  change.</p></blockquote>
<p>By 2100, climate change and deforestation could have altered  two-thirds of the rainforests in Central and South America and about 70%  in Africa. The Amazon Basin alone could see changes in biodiversity for  80% of the region.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/7928296/Climate-change-could-destroy-80-per-cent-of-rainforest-by-next-century.html" target="_blank">U.K. Telegraph article</a> about the study quotes Daniel Nepstad, senior scientist at the Woods  Hole Research Center, which studies climate change in Massachusetts:</p>
<blockquote><p>This study is the strongest evidence yet that the world’s  natural ecosystems will undergo profound changes including severe  alterations in their species composition through the combined influence  of climate change and land use. Conservation of the world’s biota, as we  know it, will depend upon rapid, steep declines in greenhouse gas  emissions.</p></blockquote>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/09/climate-change-predicted-to-destroy-80-of-world%e2%80%99s-rainforests-by-2100/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battered by extreme heat, drought &amp; fire, Russia bans grain exports</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/09/battered-by-extreme-heat-drought-fire-russia-bans-grain-exports/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/09/battered-by-extreme-heat-drought-fire-russia-bans-grain-exports/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Battered by record heat and a drought that has destroyed millions of hectares of crops, Russia – the world’s third largest wheat exporter – has banned grain exports. Prime Minister Vladimir Putin announced: In connection with the unusually high temperatures and the drought, I consider it right to impose a temporary ban on the export [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Battered by record heat and a drought that  has  destroyed millions of hectares of crops, <a href="http://peakoil.com/consumption/russia-bans-grain-exports/" target="_blank">Russia – the world’s third largest wheat exporter – has banned grain  exports</a>.</p>
<p>Prime Minister Vladimir Putin announced:</p>
<blockquote><p>In connection with the unusually high temperatures and  the drought, I   consider it right to impose a temporary ban on the  export from Russia of   grain and other products produced from grain.</p></blockquote>
<p>Putin said Russia’s policy after December 31 would be determined by  the results of  the harvest. Russia has slashed its 2010 grain harvest  forecast to 70-75 million tonnes, compared with a harvest of 97 million  tonnes in 2009.</p>
<p>The record heat and drought have spawned widespread wildfires. Peat bog fires outside Moscow have shrouded the capital in smog. <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/wheat-prices-soar-as-russia-sizzles-a-pictorial-2010-08-05?pagenumber=7" target="_blank">Wheat prices have soared as Russia sizzles</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://s.marketwatch.com/public/resources/MWimages/MW-AF802_wheat__MG_20100805143806.jpg" alt="" width="569" height="398" /></p>
<p>Jeff Masters at <a href="http://www.wunderground.com/blog/JeffMasters/comment.html?entrynum=1571" target="_blank">Wunder Blog</a> reports<span id="entrytextsize"> the Russian population affected  by extreme heat is at least double the population of Moscow, which is </span><span id="entrytextsize">just over ten million;</span><span id="entrytextsize"> and the  death toll in Russia from the 2010 heat wave is probably at least  15,000, and may be much higher. </span>The  only comparable heat wave in European history occurred just seven years ago in 2003, and  killed an estimated 40,000 – 50,000 people, mostly in France and Italy.</p>
<div style="width: 649px;">A  comparison of August temperatures, the peak of the great European heat  wave of 2003 (left) with July temperatures from the Great Russian Heat  Wave of 2010 (right) reveals that this year&#8217;s heat wave is more intense  and covers a wider area of Europe. Image credit: NOAA/ESRL.</div>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/2010/heatwaves2003-2010.png" alt="" width="639" height="371" /></p>
<p>Masters observes this is the worst heat wave in Russian history:</p>
<blockquote><p>Prior to this year, the hottest temperature in Moscow’s  history was 37.2°C (99°F), set in August 1920. The Moscow Observatory  has now matched or exceeded this 1920 all-time record five times in the   past two weeks. Temperatures the past 27 days in a row have exceeded   30°C in Moscow. Alexander Frolov, head of Russia’s weather service, said   in a statement today, “Our ancestors haven’t observed or registered a   heat like that within 1,000 years. This phenomenon is absolutely   unique.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Russian President Dmitry Medvedev says <a href="http://climateprogress.org/2010/08/05/russia-medvedev-global-climate-change-drought-heat-wave-grain-harvest/" target="_blank">its time to face up to the reality of climate change</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>None of us can say what the next summer will be like. The  forecasts vary greatly. Everyone is talking about climate change now.  Unfortunately, what is happening now in our central regions is evidence  of this global climate change, because we have never in our history  faced such weather conditions in the past. This means that we need to  change the way we work, change the methods that we used in the past.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Fat chance of that happening, here. No matter what the evidence, it’s  business as usual, pursue growth at any cost, and let the future take  care of itself.</p>
<p>Update: Peak Oil News has posted this great graphic showing the distribution of fires:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://image3.examiner.com/images/blog/replicate/EXID10722/images/Russia1.jpg" alt="" width="449" height="360" /></p>
<p>Scientists are saying the record heat wave in Russia and the deadly  heat and flooding in Asia may become the norm rather than the exception.  The Peak Oil News piece quotes Professor Michael Mann, a noted  paleo-climatologist researcher:</p>
<blockquote><p>The record heat waves we’re seeing this summer aren’t  simply a random  event in isolation. They are embedded in the warmest 6  month period the  globe has seen in the instrumental record spanning the  past 150 years. And a wealth of paleoclimate evidence suggests that the  past few decades are the warmest period in at least a thousand years,  and perhaps much longer.</p></blockquote>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/09/battered-by-extreme-heat-drought-fire-russia-bans-grain-exports/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peak coal immanent</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/09/peak-coal-immanent/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/09/peak-coal-immanent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An analysis of coal production by Tadeusz Patzek at The University of Texas at Austin and Gregory Croft at the University of California, Berkeley concludes that the global peak of coal production from existing coalfields will occur close to the year 2011. The study was published in Energy, the International Journal. After 2011, the production [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>An <a href="http://www.utexas.edu/news/2010/07/26/engineering_patzek_coal/" target="_blank">analysis of coal production</a> by Tadeusz Patzek at The  University of  Texas at Austin and Gregory  Croft at the University of  California,  Berkeley concludes that <a href="http://peakoil.com/production/peak-coal-could-happen-by-2011/" target="_blank">the global peak of coal production from existing coalfields will  occur close to the year 2011</a>. The study was published in<em> Energy, the International Journal</em>.</p>
<p>After 2011, the production rates of coal and CO<sub>2</sub> decline,   reaching 1990 levels by the year 2037, and reaching 50% of the peak   value in the year 2047. In other words, <strong>the  peak of global coal production from the existing coalfields is  imminent, and coal production from these areas will fall by 50% in the  next 40 years</strong>.</p>
<p>The CO2 emission estimates used for government policy decisions   assume  unlimited coal and fossil fuel production for the next 100  years,  an  unrealistic premise that skews climate change models and  proposed   solutions. Co-author Tad Patzek observes:</p>
<blockquote><p>The IPCC carbon estimates, which are used by all major  decision   makers, are based on economic and policy considerations that  appear to   be unconstrained by geophysics.</p></blockquote>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/09/peak-coal-immanent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenland glacier calves huge ice island</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/09/greenland-glacier-calves-huge-ice-island/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/09/greenland-glacier-calves-huge-ice-island/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 20:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A number of stories appeared in the media last week about one of Greenland’s largest of  “outlet” glaciers (glaciers ending in the sea) calving an enormous ”ice island” of more than 100 square miles in size. None of the stories had a good graphic showing what happened. Fortunately, WWF Climate Blog has posted this one: The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A number of stories appeared in the media last week about  one of Greenland’s largest of  “outlet” glaciers (glaciers ending in the  sea) calving an enormous ”ice island” of more than 100 square miles in  size.</p>
<p>None of the stories had a good graphic showing what happened. Fortunately, <a href="http://www.wwfblogs.org/climate/content/petermann-glacier-ice-island-aug2010" target="_blank">WWF Climate Blog</a> has posted this one:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.wwfblogs.org/climate/sites/default/files/Petermann20102171020Aqualg.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="494" /></p>
<p>The glacier has lost about a quarter of its floating ice shelf.</p>
<p>A 2009 survey of 34 of the widest Greenland marine-terminating  glacier outlets from the inland ice sheet found the loss rate has been  nearly constant since 2000.</p>
<div style="width: 425px;"><img src="http://www.wwfblogs.org/climate/sites/default/files/Greenland_Glacier_Area_Change_2000-2009-415px.jpg" alt="" width="415" height="272" />Above:  cumulative annual area changes for 34 of the widest Greenland ice sheet  marine-terminating outlets.  Source: Byrd Polar Research Center.</div>
<p>To put the Petermann Glacier’s latest ice island in perspective, the   island’s area of at least 260 km² is well over twice what all 34   glaciers surveyed by the  Byrd Polar Research Center have been losing   annually (-106 km² per year).</p>
<p>Scientists recently documented the breakup up of a 7 km²  (2.7 square  mile) section of another glacier in the region, the  Jakobshavn Isbrae  glacier. The calving front – where the ice sheet  meets the ocean is now further inland than at any time previously  observed.</p>
<div style="width: 425px;"><img src="http://www.wwfblogs.org/climate/sites/default/files/Jakobshavn_2009_lg2_21911-415px.jpg" alt="" width="415" height="346" />Location  of the successive calving fronts of the Jakobshavn Isbrae glacier  between 1851 and 2009, overlain on a Landsat image from 7/29/2009.   Source: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization  Studio. Historic calving front locations courtesy of Anker Weidick and  Ole Bennike, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/09/greenland-glacier-calves-huge-ice-island/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It’s energy prices, stupid!</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/02/it%e2%80%99s-energy-prices-stupid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/02/it%e2%80%99s-energy-prices-stupid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gregor Macdonald has posted this chart at The Oil Drum which neatly shows the headwinds facing the U.S. “economy”. It’s not going to get any prettier in the future. We’re going to have to figure out what prosperity could look like in an environment where energy is going to become an ever more precious commodity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Gregor Macdonald has posted this chart at <a href="http://www.energybulletin.net/node/53644" target="_blank">The Oil Drum</a> which neatly shows the headwinds facing the U.S. “economy”.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.theoildrum.com/files/United-States-Energy-Expenditures-as-a-Percent-of-GDP-1999-2008.jpg" alt="" width="579" height="579" /></p>
<p>It’s not going to get any prettier in the future. We’re going to have to figure out what prosperity could look like in an environment where energy is going to become an ever more precious commodity.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/02/it%e2%80%99s-energy-prices-stupid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Subsidies for fossil fuels dwarf support for renewables</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/02/subsidies-for-fossil-fuels-dwarf-support-for-renewables/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/02/subsidies-for-fossil-fuels-dwarf-support-for-renewables/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewables]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year governments world-wide provided $43 – $46 billion of support to renewable energy through subsidies such as tax credits, guaranteed electricity prices known as feed-in tariffs, and alternative energy credits. Sounds pretty good, right? But not so fast. In 2008, governments provided $557 billion in subsidies to fossil fuels. An analysis by Bloomberg New [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Last year governments world-wide provided $43 – $46 billion of support to renewable energy through subsidies such as tax credits, guaranteed electricity prices known as feed-in tariffs, and alternative energy credits.</p>
<p>Sounds pretty good, right?</p>
<p>But not so fast. In 2008, governments provided $557 billion in subsidies to fossil fuels.</p>
<p>An analysis by Bloomberg New Energy Finance shows that <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-29/fossil-fuel-subsidies-are-12-times-support-for-renewables-study-shows.html" target="_blank">the global direct subsidy for fossil fuels is at least ten times the subsidy for renewables</a>.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/02/subsidies-for-fossil-fuels-dwarf-support-for-renewables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenland ice cap melt accelerating</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/02/greenland-ice-cap-melt-accelerating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/02/greenland-ice-cap-melt-accelerating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arctic ice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greenland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A British research team studying the Greenland ice sheet has discovered evidence of a rapidly accelerating rate of melt: the ice sheet in the region they are studying has dropped six meters in just one month. The shrinking of the glaciers is caused by surface melt, a vicious cycle in which melted ice brings about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A British research team studying the Greenland ice sheet has discovered evidence of a rapidly accelerating rate of melt: the ice sheet in the region they are studying has dropped six meters in just one month.</p>
<p>The shrinking of the glaciers is caused by surface melt, a vicious cycle in which melted ice brings about further thawing of the cap beneath it. Frozen ice has an “albedo”, or reflectivity, of around 80%, whereas open water reflects only around 20% of the sun’s rays. So as the ice melts and turns into water, its surface reflectivity decreases. It then absorbs even more of the heat from the sun, further accelerating the melting.</p>
<p>Black soot particles are also contributing, as shown in this photo in an article at Sky News.</p>
<div style="width: 410px;"><img src="http://news.sky.com/sky-news/content/StaticFile/jpg/2010/Jul/Week4/15674129.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="225" />Dr Hubbard shows how soot has pock-marked the ice</div>
<p style="text-align: left;">Dr. Alan Hubbard explains:</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">What you see in there is a bunch of particles of aeolian dust . . . and black soot and just particles that are in the air caused by industry or combustion engines. Because they are dark in color, compared to the ice that surrounds it, which is white, they absorb more of the sunlight and a lot more of its energy, which creates a positive feedback and so they effectively drill down into the surface of the ice sheet.</p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/02/greenland-ice-cap-melt-accelerating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Global warming responsible for 40% decline in ocean phytoplankton</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/02/global-warming-responsible-for-40-decline-in-ocean-phytoplankton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/02/global-warming-responsible-for-40-decline-in-ocean-phytoplankton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 16:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microscopic life crucial to the marine food chain is dying out. The consequences could be catastrophic. So reads the headline of an article in the U.K. Independent reporting on new research published in the journal Nature. The study, titled Global phytoplankton decline over the past century, finds there has been a 40% decline in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<blockquote><p><strong>Microscopic life crucial to the marine food chain is dying out. The consequences could be catastrophic.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>So reads the headline of an article in the U.K. <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/climate-change/the-dead-sea-global-warming-blamed-for-40-per-cent-decline-in-the-oceans-phytoplankton-2038074.html" target="_blank">Independent</a> reporting on new research published in the journal Nature. The study, titled <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v466/n7306/abs/nature09268.html" target="_blank">Global phytoplankton decline over the past century</a>, finds <strong>there has been a 40% decline in the ocean’s phytoplankton over the last 100 years – and global warming is to blame</strong>.</p>
<p>The microscopic plants that support all life in the oceans are dying off at a rate of about 1% per year. The decline is related to rising sea surface temperatures.</p>
<p>According to the Independent, the scientists said if the findings are confirmed by further studies, the decline in phytoplankton will represent the single biggest change to the global biosphere in modern times, even bigger than the destruction of the tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Phytoplankton are microscopic marine organisms capable of photosynthesis, just like terrestrial plants. They float in the upper layers of the oceans, provide much of the oxygen we breathe and account for about half of the total organic matter on Earth. Phytoplankton are the basis of life in the oceans and are essential in maintaining the health of the oceans. A 40% decline would represent a massive change to the global biosphere.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-07/du-nsr072610.php" target="_blank">press release</a> explains that in warmer oceans, the water becomes stratified, with warmer water on top of colder deeper water. Nutrients which are normally replenished by upwelling colder water are cut off, and the photosynthesizers living in the surface waters starve to death.</p>
<blockquote><p>Rising sea surface temperatures were negatively correlated with phytoplankton growth over most of the globe, especially close to the equator. Phytoplankton need both sunlight and nutrients to grow; warm oceans are strongly stratified, which limits the amount of nutrients that are delivered from deeper waters to the surface ocean. Rising temperatures may contribute to making the tropical oceans even more stratified, leading to increasing nutrient limitation and phytoplankton declines.</p></blockquote>
<p>Dave Cohen points out <a href="http://www.energybulletin.net/node/53646" target="_blank">we&#8217;re caught in a nasty downward spiral</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is clear that we have a disastrous <a href="http://nsidc.org/arcticmet/patterns/feedback_loops.html">positive feedback loop</a> at work here, in which warmer surface water supports fewer phytoplankton, which then take up less CO<sub>2</sub> from the atmosphere, which causes the surface water to warm some more due to the greenhouse effect, etc.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here’s the abstract of the Nature article:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the oceans, ubiquitous microscopic phototrophs (phytoplankton) account for approximately half the production of organic matter on Earth. Analyses of satellite-derived phytoplankton concentration (available since 1979) have suggested decadal-scale fluctuations linked to climate forcing, but the length of this record is insufficient to resolve longer-term trends. Here we combine available ocean transparency measurements and <em>in situ</em> chlorophyll observations to estimate the time dependence of phytoplankton biomass at local, regional and global scales since 1899. We observe declines in eight out of ten ocean regions, and estimate a global rate of decline of ~1% of the global median per year. Our analyses further reveal interannual to decadal phytoplankton fluctuations superimposed on long-term trends. These fluctuations are strongly correlated with basin-scale climate indices, whereas long-term declining trends are related to increasing sea surface temperatures. We conclude that global phytoplankton concentration has declined over the past century; this decline will need to be considered in future studies of marine ecosystems, geochemical cycling, ocean circulation and fisheries.</p></blockquote>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/08/02/global-warming-responsible-for-40-decline-in-ocean-phytoplankton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NOAA: scientific evidence that our world is warming is unmistakable</title>
		<link>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/07/29/noaa-scientific-evidence-that-our-world-is-warming-is-unmistakable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/07/29/noaa-scientific-evidence-that-our-world-is-warming-is-unmistakable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Just</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.goal1.org/?p=4382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has released the 2009 State of the Climate report, which concludes the scientific evidence that our world is warming is unmistakable. The past decade was the warmest on record and that the Earth has been growing warmer over the last 50 years. Human society has developed for thousands [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has released the <a href="http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/bams-state-of-the-climate/2009.php" target="_blank">2009 State of the Climate report</a>,  which concludes the scientific evidence that our  world is warming is  unmistakable. The past  decade was the warmest on record and that the  Earth has been growing warmer  over the last 50 years. <strong></strong></p>
<p><strong>Human society has developed for thousands of  years under one  climatic state,  and now a new set of climatic  conditions are taking  shape.</strong> These conditions are  consistently warmer,  and some  areas are likely to see more extreme events like  severe  drought,  torrential rain and violent storms.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/images/warmingindicators.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/images/warmingindicators.jpg" alt="" width="559" height="327" /></a></p>
<p>Deke Arndt, co-editor of the report and chief of the  Climate  Monitoring Branch of NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center, is quoted in <a href="http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2010/20100728_stateoftheclimate.html" target="_blank">NOAA’s press release</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The temperature increase of one degree Fahrenheit over   the past 50  years may seem small, but it has already altered our  planet. Glaciers and sea ice  are melting, heavy rainfall is   intensifying and heat waves are more  common. And, as the new report  tells us,  there is now evidence that  over 90 percent of warming over  the past 50 years  has gone into our  ocean.</p></blockquote>
<p>Regarding warming oceans, the report says warming has been observed  as far as 6,000 feet below the surface, but most of the heat is  accumulating in the oceans’ near-surface layers. The implications of a  warming ocean are considerable. First, because water expands as it  warms, ocean heating is responsible for much of the observed sea-level  rise (melting of land-based ice is responsible for the rest). Further,  the oceans will hold the heat they’ve accumulated because they warm and  cool much more slowly than air – meaning the impacts of warming will  continue to be felt long after greenhouse gas emissions peak and begin  to decline, should humans ever manage to muster the wisdom and the will  to make that happen.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.goal1.org/archives/2010/07/29/noaa-scientific-evidence-that-our-world-is-warming-is-unmistakable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
